Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ned Gardiner's avatar

Rohit, I appreciate this essay very much. Did you derive it from commentary on the Māṇḍūkya Upaniṣad? I ask because your scholarship and study are inspiring. I'm curious about your process in writing this. I have a more important question, too. We learn from BKS Iyengar that citta is composed of manas, buddhi, and ahamkara. I always wonder where this idea comes from. Is it the Māṇḍūkya Upaniṣad? I note your description of "the four parts of the inner instrument (antaḥkaraṇa): mind (manas), intellect (buddhi), ego (ahaṅkāra), and memory (citta)." These ideas are all listed together but not with the first three comprising the fourth. I'm very curious where Guruji's notion of citta comes from. Perhaps you can shed some light?

Expand full comment
Cathy's avatar

Rohit I really enjoy this article! I read it twice and will most likely study it again😊. It was very informative and next time I chant Om it will be with more understanding and connection ! “ See “ you in the next Gulnaaz class !!

Cathy

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts